The king Dutugemunu’s “spirit lived on and manifested
itself continually in the religious and architectural activity of successive
kings to the very beginning of the 19th century “-and it remains so
to the present day. Dutugemunu the warrior king dominates Sri Lanka’s history just
as Asoka shines in Indian history as a symbol of its glory and greatness.
Dutugemunu is important to Sri Lanka’s history not so much as a hero who
spearheaded the move against a northern foe, but as afar seeing ruler who
prevented this island from losing its national identity by being absorbed into
the framework of the economic and cultural expansion of the cholas in south
India.
Anuradhapura has flourished as a great city reflecting
the heritage of the early kings, Pandukabhaya, Devanampiyatissa and their
successors, until a wave of south Indian invasion led to its neglect. Sri Lanka
did not have to face many dangers from the Indian subcontinent during the first
few centuries of settlement. Relations were cordial between the two countries
as recorded in the Mahavamsa and earlier chronicles of the ancient Sinhalese,
as well as in the Asokan inscription of India. Trade between Sri Lanka and
India ports had been there since prehistory, and Greek and roman trading
vessels plied between the far East and West Asia carrying exotic goods to
Europe from collection centres as Indian oceans ports. Indian merchants would
have been involved in this trade between Sri Lanka ports and West Asia.this is
confirmed in many ancient documents such as the periplus of the Erythraean sea,
a 1st or 2nd century A.D manuscript, which records the
voyage of a Greek navigator who sailed to these lands of the Indian ocean
region. He mentions Sri Lanka as aport of call. These merchants were mainly
interested in trading with the island during those early years, and did not
pose a political threat. Although Rome controlled the economic activities of
the Mediterranean and the orient to a great extent, it was not interested in
sending its legions beyond West Asia.
Towards the 3rd century B.C South Indian
kingdom began to look on this island as an extension of their trading ventures.
The friendly relation between the maurya kings and Sri Lanka has protected the
island from hostile forces elsewhere in the Indian subcontinent. The South
Indian state had not been completely under the sway of Asoka’s empire and had
preserved their own cultural traditions since the day of Alexander and Chandragupta
Maurya. Asoka’s edicts proclaimed his suzerainty over the whole of the
subcontinent, but the southern states were independent to a great extent and
subsequently they emerged as power to be reckoned with after the disintegration
of the Mauryan Empire.
In 177 B.C South Indian adventures who may have been
traders ruled in Anuradhapura for numbers of years. They were followed by the
Chola King Elara who ruled for approximately 44 years. Sri Lanka had now become
important to the trading interest of South India.
The Sinhalese people accepted Elara’s rule as no
strong ruler had emerged among the Sinhala clans to counteract the force of the
Cholas. According to the Buddhist chronicles Elara was just ruler, but the
country began to be restive under the yoke of a king who was Hindu by religion and was of the Chola
race. Elara’s connection with other
chola groups in South India endangered the future independence of the island.
The firm commitment to Buddhism by the Sinhala rulers of Anuradhapura was not
easily forgotten. The memories of king Dewanampiyatissa and the monument built
to house Buddhist relics, and the presence of the past heritage of the early
Sinhalese settlers. The rulers of Rohana, where the Sinhalese royal family
continued the traditions of Anuradhapura, awaited a time when they could regain
their lost capital. These kings came under the sway of the king of
Anuradhapura-in this case the chola king Elara. The Sinhalese people
intermingled with the armies and administration of the northern king, but the
Buddhist and Sinhalese traditions were still alive and the island awaited a
leader who could rally these force around him to confront the north. The
Mahavamsa gives much prominence to the story of king Dutugemunu and his life
history is presented in great detail as an inspiration to all other kings who
followed him. In a similar vein, Geoffery of Monmouth wrote his Arthurian saga
in the middle ages, which led to other epic poems such as Tennyson’s ldylls of
the king, where romantic literature is woven around ancient tales of folk
heroes.
Tracing Dutudemunu’s origins, the Mahavamsa story
unfold in the South Western coast of Sri Lanka where king Kelanitissa
sacrifices his daughter to the angry gods of the ocean who had devastated the
land with a tidal wave. Kelanitissa had offended the god and his people by
killing a saintly monk due to palace intrigue. His daughter, who was set adrift
in a golden barge to appease the gods of the sea. Drifted to the Southern
Kingdom of Rohana-where Kavantissa ruled at Magama. Shrines situated along the
south east coast of Sri Lanka such as Muhudumahavihara are associated with
vihara maha dewi’s historic sea voyage. Kavantissa married the princess who came to be known as Vihara Maha Dewi in the
legends of the old. Kavantiss and Vihara Maha Dewi had two sons- Dutugemunu
being the elder, and Tissa, the younger son.
Kavantissa was a quite man who used statecraft to
expand his kingdom of Rohana by annexing the settlements of minot rules so that
the rule of the king at Magama extended almost to the northern boundaries of
Anuradhapura, where Elara ruled. Magama and Anuradhapura had the same Buddhist
traditions of Maurya India in many ways, as they had both been in existence
since the day of the first kings of Anuradhapura, Dutugemunu in his youth had
offended his father Kavantissa by taunting him about his slow political scheme
of unification. He was banished from the kingdom for this, and lived in the
hill country forests in the kotmale district gathering an army around him.
After the death of Kavantissa, Dutugemunu became the
ruler of Rohana and planned his campaign Against the northern kingdom. His
rallying call to the Sinhalese was answered by the chieftains and leaders of
various settlements, as well as by members of the Buddhist clergy, some of whom
donned armour for the duration of the war and reverted to their saintly lives
after the wars were over. Nandimitra, Suranimala, Mahasona, Gothabaya, Teraputta
were some of the larger than life heroes of Herculean stature who followed
Dutugemunu inti battle. Elara’s commander-in-chief, Dighajantu, is cast in the
same mould. At the beginning of this long campaign, the king had to subdue some
of the local rulers including his brother, Tissa, who did not wish to be
subservient to the Rohana king. The army of Dutugemunu on its way from Rohana
in the south to Rajarata in the north, camped at many sites which are still a part of
the folk lore of the island. From Mahiyangana to Vijithapura a long line of
enemy forts succumbed to the southern forces.
Dutugemunu’s historic battle against Elara, with both
kings on elephants, seems almost Homeric in aspect and was fought according to
all the laws of chivalry extolled in great Indian epic poems such as the
Mahabaratha. Elara was killed by Dutugemunu in this battle, but was given all
the honors due to him in funeral rites according to royalty. Before he was
finally vanquished, Elara had asked for aid from South India, and Dutugemunu
had to once again face an army which landed at Mahatitta, led by a chief named
Bhalluka, who advanced upon Aniradhapura. In the battle which ensued,
Dutugemunu gained another victory destroying Bhalluka and his chola forces.
Once all his rivals were subdued and the chola power in the north vanquished,
Dutugemunu began to rule the kingdom from Anuradhapura. The wars were over and
a great future lay ahead for this city. Dutugemunu commenced his greatest work-the
building of the great stupa- the ruwanweli seya and also numerous other
monuments, such as the Lovamahapaya or Brazen place which was nine storeys
high, and the Mirissa stupa. The Ruwanweliya seya is one of the three great
stupas of Anuradhapura and dwarfs the stupas of South East Asian in size. The
nine storeyed Lovamahapaya is described as a royal monastery to accommodate
monks according to their levels of enlightment. Much later, South Indian
structure such as the Dharmaraja Rath at Mahamallapuram could have been built
on similar lines. It was earlier thought that the description of the
Lovamahapaya in the Mahavamsa may have exaggerated the splendor of the Buddhist
monuments in the Anuradhapura to impress rulers who succeeded to the Sinhala
throne after the heroic age of the Sinhalese king. But archaeology is proving
that some of the description are not fiction but fact, as bronze tiles have
been discovered at sites in Anuradhapura, which might be evidence that the
Lovamahapaya and other edifices shone in regal splendor during Dutugemunu’s time.
Buddhism regained its lost glory and Anuradhapura once
again became the greatest city in the lamd- a focus of travelers from other
countries who visited these great Buddhist architectural wonders and commented
on them. The final phase of the building of the Ruwanweliseya stupa could not
be completed during Dutugemunu’s lifetime. The Mahavamsa dwells on the last
moments of the dying monarch, as he gazed upon the gleaming white dome-hastily
covered with white cloth to resemble the finished stupa. Dutugemunu’s brother,
Saddhatissa, completed the building of the Ruwanweli seya and also ushered in
an active period of great irrigation scheme. This was a feature of the peaceful
times which dawned in the island after years of South Indian invasions.
King Dutugemunu’s statue which faces the Ruwanweliseya
is one of the finest pieces of the sculpture constructed by later kings
influenced by the Amaravati school of art in India which produced some of the
beautiful Buddha images of the time. The grandeur of this statue also suggests
the indo-Greek influence of the Kushans at Mathura.
Roamn forms in art and architecture during the late
republic and later empire, were influenced by the Etruscan and Hellenic
heritage of Italy and Greece. The second century B.C produced one of the finest
Hellenic statues-that of Aphrodite of Melos or the ‘ Venus de Milo’ –
which served as a model for Roman
sculpture in the years to come. The roman frieze at pergamon depicting the
battle of the gods and giants was part of the altar of zeus constructed during
this time. When kings such as Dutugemunu in
Sri Lanka were engaged in building great religious monuments, edifices
reflecting the civic pride of the growing empire were taking shape in Rome as
well as in the lands colonized by them.
Western history at this time was dominated by the
Roman who were becoming more powerful. They controlled most of the
Mediterranean and dominated carthage, Macedonia and Syria. Roman public life on
the other hans was full of corruption and strife as officials from wealthy
Roman families ruled as a closed aristocracy. Provincial governors and the
aristocracy in Rome kept the masses from active participation in public life.
Two roman of note were Gaius and Tiberius Gracchus. They were political
reformers who carried out extensive agricultural reform, and tried to give
political rights to the people. They were murdered while in office by
conservative groups controlling all aspects of public life. Externally, Roman
trade flourished and commerce developed around the Indian Ocean.
India at this time witnessed the end of the Maurya
dynasty which was succeeded by the sungas, who ruled from Magadha. The Andhras
succeeded to the Maurya lands in the South East of India. The building of
stupas and other forms of sculpture art, which was a phenomenon of the
post-Maurya era in India, was continued by the Sungas. The first invaders of
India in the nd century B.C were Greeks from Bactria who established thrie rule
in the Punjab and Indus valley ; they were followed by the sake or Scythians,
and finally by the parthians or pahlavas from Iran. These groups carved out
kingdom in northern India. The kushans were the last of the groups from
Bactria. An important indo- Greek ruler of the time was king Menander
(Milinda), a contemporary of Dutugemunu, who reigned from from 155-145 B.C. He was a Buddhist who figured in
the canonical work, “The Milindapanha” pr ‘questions of Menander’…. He was
regarede as a protector of Buddhism, the Greek in India being generous donors
to Buddhist establishments. The coins of Menander bear the Buddhsit wheel or
Dharmachakra on them. Buddhism appealed to the intellectuals of the Age, both
India and In the other lands to which the missionaries travelled.
In Britain, the Iron Age Celtic tribes were building
hill forts as the time that king Dutugemunu was engaged in the process of
restoring Anuradhapura as a great cultural centre of the Buddhsit. The early
Irish writings describe the tribal settlements of the celts as farming
communities. The use of iron weapons and toolshad given the Celts mastery over
the rat of European during the early years. The La Tene Celts from Europe has
spread their civilization as far north as Britain and Scotland by this time the
early Celtic town-ships that emerged in Britain and France during the second
century B.C were converted to hill forts for defensive purposes. Britain, in
150 B.C., would have had hill forts and sacred oak groves where the Druids
performed their magical rites, including human sacrifice. Celtic art was
influenced by continental styles. The Druids became the transmitters of the
oral traditional of the Celts and advisers to tribal chief.
In the Middle East, after
Alexander’s death in 323 B.C, Palestine had become a buffer state between Syria
under the Seleucid dynasty and Egypt under the ptolemies. Until 198 B.C, it was
controlled by the Egyptians and after that the Seleucids attempted to Hellenize
the Jewish lands. Greek dress, sports. Language and literature were popular
with the local rulers such as Antiochus Epiphanies who reigned from 175-163
B.C. The jews finally revolted when the temple at Jerusalem Zeus. The Maccabean
(Hasmonean) dynasty of jewish leaders began to control the destiny of Judea,
which became an independent kingdom in 157 B.C religious groups such as the
Pharisees, the Saducees and the Essenes interpreted the Jewish law to the
people of Judea. The Essenes lived in
monastic communities practicing ascetic living and rites of purification,
preparing for the dawn of a Messianic Kingdom. The dead Sea Scrolls, discovered
(in 1947) in Qumran, may have been written at this time. Hebrew and Aramaic writings,
as well as the books of the Jewish Old Testament were painstakingly recorded on
leather and papyrus scrolls by scholars living in these cave dwellings. Their
doctrines paved the way for the teachings of Jesus nearly two hundred years
later.
No comments:
Post a Comment